What distinguishes an expressed contract from an implied contract?

The distinction between an expressed contract and an implied contract is fundamentally based on how the terms of the agreement are communicated and understood. An expressed contract is clearly articulated, where the parties involved have explicitly stated the terms and conditions either verbally or in writing. This clarity allows for a straightforward understanding of each party's obligations and expectations.

In contrast, an implied contract is not directly stated. Instead, it is inferred from the actions, behaviors, or circumstances surrounding the parties involved. The agreement is assumed based on the context and the relationship between the parties rather than on explicitly expressed terms. For example, if you order food at a restaurant, there is an implied contract that you will pay for the meal upon receipt, even though the payment terms weren't verbally discussed.

This clarity in the definition of expressed contracts and the inference process used for implied contracts is what makes the correct answer accurate. It captures the essence of how both types of contracts operate in legal contexts and their enforceability.